Min Sik who saw the accident is me ask a black box. Min sikyibeop black box I receive are looking at the next eokae damage? Min Sik case.

Whether or not it'll apply more careful course that is not part of the opposition to try bikkol. "There was no luck" "excessive punishment" Why come claim? However, the assertion that "there was no accident the driver is lucky", "Min sikyibeop is excessive punishment" in the political debate Apart from the online community legislation has gained some appeal in a car etc. community. First complaint from the perspective of the driver's visibility is not easy because "illegal parking. Children can not help it come out of nowhere a "will. In addition,

Even if no negligence is not zero, that applies even if the negligence of the driver bit except when the driver is innocent Min Sik yibeopyi. Be sure to gross negligence caused the accident in the school zone not applied yibeopyi Min Sik. "If you violate the civil sikyibeop (teukgabeop) in the school zone embellish the child deaths are unconditionally live more than three years in prison" => This also

I think so And there're also many ways like itneungeo positive part good. General're the driver anyway by the time school zones over the things kids go to class because the kids still have time to see almost no te. And it inde black box video vision disturbance caused by vehicle accidents were the main cause of this is stopping at a crosswalk, and high-speed sprint of a child getneyo disappear when cleaning is carried Min Sik yibeopyi vehicles parking in school zones. This isnt can it be safe to travel 100 km per hour. If you see a child doenikkayo immediately reduce your speed. In many ways, the positive effect is much like going. Numbers in online'm really hot and the law passed sikyibeop

If an accident occurs, the child was so lucky to have crossed As a result of the death jjiteo head on the sidewalk block edges caused bad driver will be equivalent to imprisonment up to three years' imprisonment or more - weapons. If you are interested in studying criminal hasyeotgeona, who studied minutes, or seemed to want to know how maneusin saying how scary the word 'imprisonment for more than three years, without any penalties. A: 'shall be subject to imprisonment for at least three years' B: the same "shall be subject to imprisonment for seven years or less, the B's punishment will be heavier, in fact, A is the more severe type. B, on the other hand from 1 month to 7 years imprisonment to be equivalent to less than A is possible to impose three years in prison to 30 years

Minutes, you do not have a black box minutes deusin those economic forces will be more and more attention. Who can demonstrate a no-fault in an accident with a pedestrian only angetji hesitate entering the school zone, probably like most people would be reluctant to enter school zone. What if I receive a no-fault driver in an accident with a pedestrian? Manyirado in a school zone suggesting a primary purpose the protection of children is a hundred times will resonate. Adults are responsible should be protecting children, there is a duty. Purpose of protecting children, seems to keenly realize deeply both pedestrians and motorists. But the driver

Creating was Equatorial based walking minutes all get a simple popularity in recent Youtube'll never be, of course He armed all the judgments can not I there are no errors, but much expertise and knowledge and legal knowledge than the general things in the minutes of ingeo is clear . I'm a hot story in the civil lawyers sikyibeop hanmuncheol pores look up individual personal opinion ran the story. Worldly

While the signal is a violation of such teukgabeop this core is many people 'as little' high evaluation part "professional negligence" that embellish the case of an accident. It is that the driver "professional negligence" means "every driver should always be careful while driving. Talking to the driver that if something goes wrong and a little recognized that the "professional negligence", ie civil sikyibeop subject. And what is true even if the glance Nancy Sell Children traffic accidents, and also applies to the case of children than the fault of the driver incorrectly bigger. "This gross negligence

is. However, there is a 'legal amendments regarding the weighting punish certain crimes, the controversy relating to the penalties among many. Attach the first legal amendments below. Like those shown on the 'civic sikyibeop' in 'teukgabeop' it can contain the contents of the weight penalty for the driver that caused the accident against children in the child protection area. Motorists will comply with the measures according to paragraph 1, as in the child protection area in accordance with the "Road Traffic Law" Article 12, paragraph 3, and to be aware of the safety of children while driving

For any reason and must be returned to gongmuwonjeung, especially elementary school teachers, kindergarten teachers working in the school zone near'd like to be put should be especially careful. A little child, not the death penalty dachyeodo minimum 5 million won. If the amount of fines and is separately considered the amount owing, alimony, insurance, etc. necessary for the proceedings in progress will seem unable to ignore economic losses than ten million won can actually come along also charged with criminal penalty. (As well as life and health of children in financially is important as impossible to calculate.) Above the same content

Kkamansaek vehicle is confirmed in the red light beulbak such as a blinking left turn and brake beulbak indoor car. You can also see me standing in the middle of the interval is quite wide lanes and see it in India as illegal parking. If the signal waiting car, in my opinion, they did not violate the crosswalk to the Korando vehicles it found illegally parked are not children better but did not produce accident. Of course, the school zone illegally parked not know why this comes out to talk with no evidence, at least in this case but can cause accidents occur. I think perhaps the other yirang